Patrones y resultados del cambio de anticoagulantes orales directos en la fibrilación auricular no valvular: experiencia en la práctica clínica en España / Patterns and outcomes of switching direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A real-world experience from Spain

Objetivos El objetivo consistía en evaluar un programa de gestión de anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) según sus perfiles, idoneidad de la dosis, patrones de cambio de tratamiento, efectividad y seguridad Se trató de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y longitudinal en una cohorte de pacientes atendidos en la práctica clínica cotidiana en un hospital regional español con un plan de seguimiento de 3 años para pacientes que iniciaron el tratamiento con dabigatrán, rivaroxabán o apixabán entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2016. Métodos Se analizaron 490 episodios de tratamiento (apixabán 2,5mg, 9,4%; apixabán 5mg, 21,4%; dabigatrán 75mg, 0,6%; dabigatrán 110mg, 12,4%; dabigatrán 150mg, 19,8%; rivaroxabán 15mg, 17,8%; rivaroxabán 20mg, 18,6%) en 445 pacientes. En el 13,6% de los pacientes tratados con dabigatrán, el 9,7% de los tratados con rivaroxabán y el 3,9% de los tratados con apixabán se cambió a otros ACOD o se modificó la dosis. Resultados El ACOD al que se cambió con mayor frecuencia fue el apixabán. Los motivos más frecuentes para cambiar de tratamiento fueron toxicidad (23,8%), hemorragia (21,4%) y deterioro renal (16,7%). En el 23,8% de los episodios se constató una inadecuación de la dosis. Las tasas de ictus y accidentes isquémicos transitorios (AIT) fueron de 1,64 y 0,54 eventos/100 años/paciente, respectivamente, mientras que las de hemorragias importantes, no importantes, pero clínicamente relevantes (NICR) e intracraneales fueron de 2,4, 5 y 0,5 eventos/100 años/paciente, respectivamente. Las hemorragias digestivas y genitourinarias fueron el tipo más frecuente de eventos hemorrágicos. En el análisis multifactorial, el ictus previo y la edad fueron factores predictivos independientes de ictus/AIT. El uso concomitante de antiagregantes plaquetarios, el sexo masculino y la edad fueron factores predictivos independientes de eventos hemorrágicos (AU)

Aims The aim is to evaluate a management program for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients according to their profiles, appropriateness of dosing, patterns of crossover, effectiveness and safety. This is an observational and longitudinal prospective study in a cohort of patients attended in daily clinical practice in a regional hospital in Spain with 3-year a follow-up plan for patients initiating dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban between Jan/2012 and Dec/2016. Methods We analyzed 490 episodes of treatment (apixaban 2.5, 9.4%; apixaban 5, 21.4%; dabigatran 75, 0.6%; dabigatran 110, 12.4%; dabigatran 150, 19.8%; rivaroxaban 15, 17.8% and rivaroxaban 20, 18.6%) in 445 patients. 13.6% of patients on dabigatran, 9.7% on rivaroxaban, and 3.9% on apixaban switched to other DOACs or changed dosing. Results Apixaban was the most frequent DOAC switched to. The most frequent reasons for switching were toxicity (23.8%), bleeding (21.4%) and renal deterioration (16.7%). Inappropriateness of dose was found in 23.8% of episodes. Rates of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) were 1.64/0.54 events/100 patients-years, while rates of major, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding and intracranial bleeding were 2.4, 5, and 0.5 events/100 patients-years. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary bleeding were the most common type of bleeding events (BE). On multivariable analysis, prior stroke and age were independent predictors of stroke/TIA. Concurrent platelet inhibitors, male gender and age were independent predictors of BE. Conclusion This study complements the scant data available on the use of DOACs in NVAF patients in Spain, confirming a good safety and effectiveness profil (AU)

Dabigatran Dosing Proposal for Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: Stress-Testing Renal Function Range in Real World Patients.

Dabigatran is the first of four direct-acting oral anticoagulants approved to prevent stroke in adult patients with atrial fibrillation using a fixed two-dose scheme compared with warfarin dosing adjusted to a prothrombin time range associated with optimal risk reduction in stroke and serious bleeding. The pivotal phase III trial found dabigatran, depending on dose, is superior to warfarin in stroke reduction and similar in bleeding risk while also showing dabigatran efficacy and safety correlate with steady-state plasma concentrations. Because the relationship between dabigatran dose and plasma concentration is highly variable, a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model of over 9,000 clinical trial patients was used as a basis for simulations comparing the performance of dosing via the drug label to other proposed doses and regimens. Assessment of dosing regimen performance was based on simulations of trough plasma levels within the therapeutic concentration range of 75-150 ng/mL over a renal function range of 15-250 mL/min creatinine clearance, representing extremes for real-world patients. An improved regimen that best achieves this therapeutic range was identified, requiring five different dosing schedules, corresponding to specified renal function ranges, compared with the two approved in the label. The discussion focuses on how this information could better inform patient outcomes and future dabigatran development.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (ACTION-CVT): A Multicenter International Study.

BACKGROUND: A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups. RESULTS: Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140-720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51-1.73]; P=0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22-2.76]; P=0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48-1.73]; P=0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.82]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Simultaneous subacute interstitial nephritis and anticoagulant-related nephropathy related to novel oral anticoagulants use.

Introduction: Interstitial nephritis related to novel oral anticoagulants was only reported in sporadic case reports and none was accompanied by anticoagulants related nephropathy (ARN).Case Report: We presented here a case of biopsy-proven subacute interstitial nephritis (SubAIN) accompanied by ARN after oral dabigatran to alarm clinicians. This case manifested with gross hematuria, acute kidney injury, slightly prolonged thrombin time, moderate anemia, moderate proteinuria, a large quantity of intratubular hemoglobin casts confirmed by hemoglobin antibody immunohistochemical staining which presumed to occur around 1 week after dabigatran and subacute interstitial nephritis accompanied by focal proliferative glomerulonephritis. Serum creatinine level did not continue to elevate after discontinuation of the oral anticoagulant. With the subsequent supportive therapy, it decreased to some extent then reduced to normal with the help of prednisone (half of the full dose).Conclusions: When we came across a patient who manifested as hematuria or acute kidney injury with a history of anticoagulants usage, we should think of ARN and pay more attention on history collection. Secondly, subacute interstitial nephritis may coexist with ARN. Thirdly, hemoglobin immunohistochemical staining may be helpful to make it clear whether the intra-tubular protein casts came from red blood cells. In addition, for those patients who may have decreased kidney function, anticoagulants dose should be reduced to prevent the occurrence of ARN.

Propensity score methods for comparative-effectiveness analysis: A case study of direct oral anticoagulants in the atrial fibrillation population.

OBJECTIVE: To explore methodological challenges when using real-world evidence (RWE) to estimate comparative-effectiveness in the context of Health Technology Assessment of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Scotland. METHODS: We used linkage data from the Prescribing Information System (PIS), Scottish Morbidity Records (SMR) and mortality records for newly anticoagulated patients to explore methodological challenges in the use of Propensity score (PS) matching, Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) and covariate adjustment with PS. Model performance was assessed by standardised difference. Clinical outcomes (stroke and major bleeding) and mortality were compared for all DOACs (including apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin. Patients were followed for 2 years from first oral anticoagulant prescription to first clinical event or death. Censoring was applied for treatment switching or discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, a good balance of patients' covariates was obtained with every PS model tested. IPW was found to be the best performing method in assessing covariate balance when applied to subgroups with relatively large sample sizes (combined-DOACs versus warfarin). With the IPTW-IPCW approach, the treatment effect tends to be larger, but still in line with the treatment effect estimated using other PS methods. Covariate adjustment with PS in the outcome model performed well when applied to subgroups with smaller sample sizes (dabigatran versus warfarin), as this method does not require further reduction of sample size, and trimming or truncation of extreme weights. CONCLUSION: The choice of adequate PS methods may vary according to the characteristics of the data. If assumptions of unobserved confounding hold, multiple approaches should be identified and tested. PS based methods can be implemented using routinely collected linked data, thus supporting Health Technology decision-making.

Impact of different renal function equations on direct oral anticoagulant concentrations.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by different renal function equations and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant concentration. Atrial fibrillation patients who aged ≥ 20 years and used dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for thromboembolism prevention were enrolled to collect blood samples and measure drug concentrations using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The GFR was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault formula (abbreviated as creatinine clearance, CrCL), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI) featuring both creatinine and cystatin C, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation (MDRD). Multivariate regression was used to investigate the associations of different renal function estimates with drug concentrations. A total of 511 participants were enrolled, including 146 dabigatran users, 164 rivaroxaban users and 201 apixaban users. Compared to clinical trials, 35.4% of dabigatran, 4.9% of rivaroxaban, and 5.5% of apixaban concentrations were higher than the expected range (p < 0.001). CKD-EPI and MDRD estimates classified fewer patients as having GFR < 50 mL/min than CrCL in all 3 groups. Both CrCL and CKD-EPI were associated with higher-than-expected ranges of dabigatran or rivaroxaban concentrations. Nevertheless, none of the renal function equations was associated with higher-than-expected apixaban concentrations. For participants aged ≥ 75 years, CKD-EPI may be associated with higher-than-expected trough concentration of dabigatran. In conclusion, CrCL and CKD-EPI both can be used to identify patients with high trough concentrations of dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Among elderly patients who used dabigatran, CKD-EPI may be associated with increased drug concentration.

Dabigatran for stroke prevention in real life in a sample of population from Turkey: D-SPIRIT registry.

OBJECTIVE: The D-SPIRIT registry is designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate in patients with atrial fibrillation in routine clinical practice. METHODS: D-SPIRIT is the first national, multicenter, prospective, observational, postmarketing registry that investigates the usage of dabigatran in real life. A total of 326 noveloral anticoagulant-eligible patients with atrial fibrillation who have been taking dabigatran etexilate therapy for stroke prevention at least 6 months from 9 different centers were enrolled into the registry. Patients were followed up for 2 years to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the treatment. All adverse clinical events including bleeding, thromboembolic events, stroke, systemic embolism, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age was 71.1±9.6 years, and 57.4% of the study participants were female. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack [TIA], vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score was 3.4±1.6. The cumulative adverse clinical events rate was 6.30% per year. The rate for embolic events including TIA, ischemic stroke, and peripheral embolism was 1.26% per year. The rate for major bleeding was 2.20% per year, and the mortality rate was 0.94% per year. CONCLUSION: This registry obtained an important overview of the current safety and effectiveness of the dabigatran etexilate in Turkey. Our results indicate similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events with pivotal phase 3 trial and other real-life registries. However, rate of undertreatment usage of dabigatran etexilate in real life was found to be considerable.

Patient perception and treatment convenience of dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonist when used for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: Real-world Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Treatment Experience (RE-LATE) study.

PURPOSE: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Real-world data about patient preference, satisfaction and convenience in patients in Asia are not available. The study aimed to explore the perception of patients with newly diagnosed NVAF regarding dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), when used for stroke prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multinational, multicentre, non-interventional study involving 49 sites across 5 countries in South East Asia and South Korea where 934 patients newly diagnosed with NVAF were initiated on either dabigatran (N=591) or VKA (N=343). Data were collected at baseline and over two follow-up visits across 6 months. Treatment satisfaction and patient convenience were evaluated using the Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire-2 (PACT-Q2). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.9±10.4 years, and 64.2% were male. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.4±1.5, and mean HAS-BLED score was 1.2±0.9. At baseline, patients initiated on dabigatran had higher stroke risk, bleeding risk, creatinine clearance and proportion of patients with concomitant illnesses compared with patients initiated on VKAs. Treatment convenience was perceived to be significantly better with dabigatran versus VKAs at visits 2 and 3 (p=0.0423 and 0.0287, respectively). Treatment satisfaction was significantly better with dabigatran compared with VKAs at visit 3 (p=0.0300). CONCLUSION: In this study, dabigatran is associated with better patient perception in terms of treatment convenience and satisfaction compared with VKAs when used for stroke prevention in newly diagnosed NVAF patients from South East Asia and South Korea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02849509. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patient satisfaction with dabigatran versus VKAs in South East Asia. Patients with atrial fibrillation are at high risk of stroke and require anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Two such anticoagulants are dabigatran and VKAs. We wanted to compare the extent of satisfaction and treatment convenience among newly diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation from the South East Asian region when they were given either dabigatran or VKAs. Consenting patients filled out a standardised questionnaire called the PACT-Q2 over three visits after they were started on either dabigatran (591 patients) or VKAs (343 patients). We found that satisfaction and convenience were significantly higher when patients received dabigatran than when they received VKAs.

Difference in left atrial D-dimer level in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulant.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause cerebral and systemic embolism. An increased D-dimer level indicates hyperactivation of secondary fibrinolysis, resulting in predilection for thrombosis. To clarify the differential effects of anticoagulation therapy, we compared the D-dimer levels in peripheral and left atrial (LA) blood of atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for ablation. METHODS: We analyzed 141 patients with non-valvular AF (dabigatran, n = 30; apixaban, n = 47; edoxaban, n = 64; mean age: 68 years, male: 60%). Peripheral venous blood and LA blood was collected before pulmonary vein isolation. We examined the laboratory and echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, D-dimer level in the LA was significantly higher in patients treated with edoxaban than that in those on apixaban (0.77 ± 0.05 vs. 0.60 ± 0.05 µg/mL, P = 0.047), although there were no significant differences in peripheral D-dimer levels. We classified the D-dimer value of the LA into a normal group (< 0.9) and a high value group (≥ 1.0); the peripheral prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 level (odds ratio [OR] 1.012; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.022; P = 0.008) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR, 0.947; 95% CI, 0.910-0.986; P = 0.008) were potential predictors of high LA D-dimer levels. CONCLUSIONS: In apixaban-treated patients, the D-dimer level in the left atrium was lower than in edoxaban-treated patients on the day of ablation, suggesting that the anticoagulant effect of apixaban on the left atrium is better than that of edoxaban in patients with AF.

Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Development in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: An Analysis of the RE-SPECT ESUS Trial.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source have silent atrial fibrillation (AF) or develop AF after the initial evaluation. Better understanding of the risk for development of AF is critical to implement optimal monitoring strategies with the goal of preventing recurrent stroke attributable to underlying AF. The RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) provides an opportunity to assess predictors for developing AF and associated recurrent stroke. METHODS: RE-SPECT ESUS was a randomized, controlled trial (564 sites, 42 countries) assessing dabigatran versus aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Of 5390 patients enrolled and followed for a median of 19 months, 403 (7.5%) were found to develop AF reported as an adverse event or using cardiac monitoring per standard clinical care. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to define predictors of AF. RESULTS: In the multivariable model, older age (odds ratio for 10-year increase, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.78-2.23]; P<0.001), hypertension (odds ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.03-1.79]; P=0.0304), diabetes (odds ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.96]; P=0.022), and body mass index (odds ratio for 5-U increase, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.16-1.43]; P<0.001) were independent predictors of AF during the study. In a sensitivity analysis restricted to 1117 patients with baseline NT-proBNP (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide) measurements, only older age and higher NT-proBNP were significant independent predictors of AF. Performance of several published predictive models was assessed, including HAVOC (AF risk score based on hypertension, age ≥75 years, valvular heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery disease) and CHA2DS2-VASc (stroke risk score based on congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years [doubled], diabetes, previous stroke, transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category [female]) scores, and higher scores were associated with higher rates of developing AF. CONCLUSIONS: Besides age, the most important variable, several other factors, including hypertension, higher body mass index, and lack of diabetes, are independent predictors of AF after embolic stroke of undetermined source. When baseline NT-proBNP was available, only older age and elevation of this biomarker were predictive of subsequent AF. Understanding who is at higher risk of developing AF will assist in identifying patients who may benefit from more intense, long-term cardiac monitoring. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Four Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Japanese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Real-World Data.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the differences in safety and effectiveness among four DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, in Japanese patients have not been clarified. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to directly compare the safety and effectiveness among the four DOACs using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) claims database. We identified 3823 patients with NVAF who started receiving a DOAC between March 2011 and June 2017. The safety outcome was major bleeding (a composite outcome of intracranial, gastrointestinal, respiratory, or renal/urinary tract bleeding) and the effectiveness outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke including transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism. We constructed a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for all four DOAC combinations. The risk of major bleeding was significantly lower in the dabigatran group than in the apixaban group (HR, 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.93; p = 0.03). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding among the other DOACs. In the composite risk of ischemic stroke including TIA or systemic embolism, there was no significant difference among the four DOACs. This study suggested that in the current use of DOACs in Japanese patients with NVAF, dabigatran had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding than apixaban, but there was no significant difference in effectiveness among the four DOACs.

A strategy of idarucizumab for pericardial tamponade during perioperative period of atrial fibrillation ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate theoptimal idarucizumab (dabigatran antagonist) usage strategy for patients with acute pericardial tamponade receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Ten patients presenting acute pericardial tamponade while receiving uninterrupted dabigatran during catheter ablation for AF in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. A "wait and see" strategy of idarucizumab was carried out for all patients; in brief, idarucizumab was applied following pericardiocentesis, comprehensive evaluation of bleeding and hemostasis. RESULTS: There were five males, five paroxysmal AF, and the average age of the patients was 64.0 ± 9.8 years. Among the 10 patients, four were treated with dabigatran 110 mg, six were treated with dabigatran 150 mg, and one was simultaneously given clopidogrel. The average time from pericardial tamponade to the last dose of dabigatran was 8.2 ± 3.4 h. All patients underwent pericardiocentesis successfully, and the average drainage volume was 322.5 ml (220.0 ± 935.0 ml). For reversal anticoagulation, six patients received protamine, and five patients received idarucizumab. Of the five patients who were treated with idarucizumab, four presented exact hemostasis, except for one patient who underwent continuous drainage and finally received surgery repair. The average time to restart anticoagulation was 1.1 ± 0.3 days after the procedure, and no rebleeding, embolism or deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: The "wait and see" strategy of idarucizumab for acute pericardial tamponade during the perioperative period of catheter ablation for AF may be safe and feasible.

Thrombin Inhibition Prevents Endothelial Dysfunction and Reverses 20-HETE Overproduction without Affecting Blood Pressure in Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension in Mice.

Angiotensin II (Ang II) induces hypertension and endothelial dysfunction, but the involvement of thrombin in these responses is not clear. Here, we assessed the effects of the inhibition of thrombin activity by dabigatran on Ang II-induced hypertension and endothelial dysfunction in mice with a particular focus on NO- and 20-HETE-dependent pathways. As expected, dabigatran administration significantly delayed thrombin generation (CAT assay) in Ang II-treated hypertensive mice, and interestingly, it prevented endothelial dysfunction development, but it did not affect elevated blood pressure nor excessive aortic wall thickening. Dabigatran's effects on endothelial function in Ang II-treated mice were evidenced by improved NO-dependent relaxation in the aorta in response to acetylcholine in vivo (MRI measurements) and increased systemic NO bioavailability (NO2- quantification) with a concomitant increased ex vivo production of endothelium-derived NO (EPR analysis). Dabigatran treatment also contributed to the reduction in the endothelial expression of pro-inflammatory vWF and ICAM-1. Interestingly, the fall in systemic NO bioavailability in Ang II-treated mice was associated with increased 20-HETE concentration in plasma (UPLC-MS/MS analysis), which was normalised by dabigatran treatment. Taking together, the inhibition of thrombin activity in Ang II-induced hypertension in mice improves the NO-dependent function of vascular endothelium and normalises the 20-HETE-depedent pathway without affecting the blood pressure and vascular remodelling.

Strategies for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients treated with dabigatran: an update.

INTRODUCTION: Although dabigatran is safer than vitamin K antagonists, bleeding still occurs. Bleeding is an important cause of short-term morbidity and rarely mortality and can also have long-term consequences that are often under-appreciated. After bleeding, patients often do not restart treatment or are poorly adherent, which is associated with increased thromboembolism and mortality. Consequently, we need strategies to prevent and treat bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran. AREAS COVERED: We review a) relevant dabigatran pharmacology, b) the burden and consequences of bleeding, c) how to identify patients at high risk of bleeding; and d) existing and novel approaches to prevent and treat bleeding in dabigatran-treated patients. EXPERT OPINION: Concerns about the risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulant therapy and emerging evidence of increased risk of thromboembolism and mortality after bleeding highlight the need for improved approaches to prevention and treatment of bleeding. Future research priorities should focus on improving our ability to prevent bleeding by identifying modifiable risk factors and the development of safer agents. The current front runners include drugs that selectively target the contact pathway of coagulation (e.g. factor XI). Targeting upstream drivers of thrombosis (e.g. inflammation) could help to further reduce the risk of thromboembolism.

The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury with Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Adults with Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anticoagulation with either a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant may be associated with AKI. Our objective was to assess the risk of AKI among elderly individuals with atrial fibrillation newly prescribed a direct oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) versus warfarin. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Our population-based cohort study included 20,683 outpatients in Ontario, Canada, ≥66 years with atrial fibrillation who were prescribed warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between 2009 and 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the basis of derived propensity scores for the treatment with each direct oral anticoagulant was used to balance baseline characteristics among patients receiving each of the three direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in the weighted population to compare the association between the prescribed anticoagulant and the outcomes of interest. The exposure was an outpatient prescription of warfarin or one of the direct oral anticoagulants. The primary outcome was a hospital encounter with AKI, defined using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes thresholds. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted by eGFR category and by the percentage of international normalized ratio measurements in range, a validated marker of anticoagulation control. RESULTS: Each direct oral anticoagulant was associated with a significantly lower risk of AKI compared with warfarin (weighted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80 for dabigatran; weighted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.98 for rivaroxaban; and weighted hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.93 for apixaban). In the subgroup analysis, the lower risk of AKI associated with each direct oral anticoagulant was consistent across each eGFR strata. The risk of AKI was significantly lower among users of each of the direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin users who had a percentage of international normalized ratio measurements ≤56%. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of AKI compared with warfarin.

Personalizing the decision of dabigatran versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) trial.

BACKGROUND: The RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial demonstrated that higher-risk patients with atrial fibrillation had lower rates of stroke or systemic embolism and a similar rate of major bleeding, on average, when treated with dabigatran 150mg compared to warfarin. Since population-level averages may not apply to individual patients, estimating the heterogeneity of treatment effect can improve application of RE-LY in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: For 18040 patients randomized in RE-LY, we used patient-level data to develop multivariable models to predict the risk for stroke or systemic embolism and for major bleeding including all three treatment groups (dabigatran 110mg, dabigatran 150mg, and warfarin) over a median follow up of 2.0 years. The mean predicted absolute risk reduction (ARR) for stroke/systemic embolism with dabigatran 150mg compared to warfarin was 1.32% (range 11.6% lower to 3.30% higher risk). The mean predicted ARR for bleeding was 0.41% (range 8.93% lower to 63.4% higher risk). Patients with increased stroke/systemic embolism risk included those with prior stroke/TIA (OR 2.01), diabetics on warfarin (OR 2.00), and older patients on dabigatran 150mg (OR 1.68 for every 10-year increase). Major bleeding risk was higher in patients on aspirin (OR 1.25), with a history of diabetes (OR 1.34) or prior stroke/TIA (OR 1.22), those with heart failure on dabigatran 110mg (OR 1.52), older patients on either dabigatran 110mg or 150mg (OR 1.57 and 1.93, respectively, for each 10-year increase), and heavier patients on dabigatran 110mg or 150mg; patients in a region outside the United States and Canada and with better renal function had lower bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial heterogeneity in the benefits and risks of dabigatran relative to warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation. Using individualized estimates may enable shared decision making and facilitate more appropriate use of dabigatran; as such, it should be prospectively tested. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00262600.

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation : A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The role of differing levels of frailty in the choice of oral anticoagulants for older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin by frailty levels. DESIGN: 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis of Medicare data, 2010 to 2017. SETTING: Community. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries with AF who initiated use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin. MEASUREMENTS: Composite end point of death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding by frailty levels, defined by a claims-based frailty index. RESULTS: In the dabigatran-warfarin cohort (n = 158 730; median follow-up, 72 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 63.5 for dabigatran initiators and 65.6 for warfarin initiators (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05]; rate difference [RD], -2.2 [CI, -6.5 to 2.1]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.81 (CI, 0.68 to 0.97), 0.98 (CI, 0.90 to 1.08), and 1.09 (CI, 0.96 to 1.23), respectively. In the rivaroxaban-warfarin cohort (n = 275 944; median follow-up, 82 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 77.8 for rivaroxaban initiators and 83.7 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.94 to 1.02]; RD, -5.9 [CI, -9.4 to -2.4]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.88 (CI, 0.77 to 0.99), 1.04 (CI, 0.98 to 1.10), and 0.96 (CI, 0.89 to 1.04), respectively. In the apixaban-warfarin cohort (n = 218 738; median follow-up, 84 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 60.1 for apixaban initiators and 92.3 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]; RD, -32.2 [CI, -36.1 to -28.3]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.61 (CI, 0.52 to 0.71), 0.66 (CI, 0.61 to 0.70), and 0.73 (CI, 0.67 to 0.80), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding and lack of clinical frailty assessment. CONCLUSION: For older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with lower rates of adverse events across all frailty levels. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower event rates only among nonfrail patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.

An emulated target trial analysis based on Medicare data suggested non-inferiority of Dabigatran versus Rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVES: Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran were the first two non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for preventing stroke among non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation patients. This article aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban versus Dabigatran. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: An emulated target trial analysis was conducted based on Medicare, in which we constructed three "randomized clinical trials" with well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, treatment regimens, and analysis procedures. We analyzed the individual trials, examined temporal variations, and generated unified results via pooled analysis. RESULTS: With a two-year data collection window (2012-2013), 70,129 subjects were enrolled in the three emulated trials, with 36,269 and 34,089 in the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran arms, respectively. Dabigatran (the reference group for hazard ratio - HR) was superior regarding time to any primary event (including ischemic stroke, other thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and death; HR 1.232, P-value 0.0025), major bleeding (HR 1.187, P-value <0.0001), and mortality (HR 1.488, P-value <0.0001). Differences regarding stroke and other thromboembolic events were not significant. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran was found as superior for the Medicare patients with multiple chronic conditions. Temporal variations, which had been largely neglected in the literature, were observed. This study may provide new insight into treating AF with NOACs.